To fuse or not to fuse, that is the question – Clinical results of DYNORFUSE study - Video
What do you think about dynamic stabilization? Which kind of technique do you prefer? Fusion or non-fusion?
Watch our animation and get an overview over the first preliminary results of the DYNORFUSE-study of Prof. Bernhard Meyer. Comparing dynamic and rigid stabilization, the study shows interesting facts:
Using the non-fusion technique, the results show significant decreases in blood loss (-25%) and surgery time (-19%).
Additionally: After 24 months, the outcome shows comparable clinical results using both, non-fusion and fusion technique.
Source: Meyer B, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Ringel F. Lumbar dynamic pedicle-based stabilization versus fusion in degenerative disease: Preliminary results of the DYNORFUSE prospective randomized trial. Eur Spine J (2018) 27: 2898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5770-2
This site is not intended for visitors from the United States of America. US Visitors must refer to http://www.ulrichmedicalusa.com
Watch our animation and get an overview over the first preliminary results of the DYNORFUSE-study of Prof. Bernhard Meyer. Comparing dynamic and rigid stabilization, the study shows interesting facts:
Using the non-fusion technique, the results show significant decreases in blood loss (-25%) and surgery time (-19%).
Additionally: After 24 months, the outcome shows comparable clinical results using both, non-fusion and fusion technique.
Source: Meyer B, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Ringel F. Lumbar dynamic pedicle-based stabilization versus fusion in degenerative disease: Preliminary results of the DYNORFUSE prospective randomized trial. Eur Spine J (2018) 27: 2898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5770-2
This site is not intended for visitors from the United States of America. US Visitors must refer to http://www.ulrichmedicalusa.com
Most popular related searches